<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top 5 CSS Mistakes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://foohack.com/2007/10/top-5-css-mistakes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://foohack.com/2007/10/top-5-css-mistakes/</link>
	<description>Isaac Schlueter on Web Development</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 02:37:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: strony internetowe wroclaw</title>
		<link>http://foohack.com/2007/10/top-5-css-mistakes/#comment-649</link>
		<dc:creator>strony internetowe wroclaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 19:43:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foohack.com/2007/10/top-5-css-mistakes/#comment-649</guid>
		<description>Hey! Yes, there are twoo millions pages about vertical aligment in CSS! That sucks, but it's true. I've had the same situation with virtual-aligmnet! cheers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey! Yes, there are twoo millions pages about vertical aligment in CSS! That sucks, but it&#8217;s true. I&#8217;ve had the same situation with virtual-aligmnet! cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cornices</title>
		<link>http://foohack.com/2007/10/top-5-css-mistakes/#comment-550</link>
		<dc:creator>Cornices</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 08:21:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foohack.com/2007/10/top-5-css-mistakes/#comment-550</guid>
		<description>That's truth! BTW: Please check your site, problaby it's css inconsistent!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s truth! BTW: Please check your site, problaby it&#8217;s css inconsistent!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Gregory</title>
		<link>http://foohack.com/2007/10/top-5-css-mistakes/#comment-426</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Gregory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 22:54:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foohack.com/2007/10/top-5-css-mistakes/#comment-426</guid>
		<description>Good writeup.   I find one of the more painful ones is:
% font sizes being relative to parent, not base
I would also like to see this be possible
.box { margin-left:2em-12px; }
I can think of several places where this could be very useful... especially since we dont have four corner backgrounds..  one can wish..  :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good writeup.   I find one of the more painful ones is:<br />
% font sizes being relative to parent, not base<br />
I would also like to see this be possible<br />
.box { margin-left:2em-12px; }<br />
I can think of several places where this could be very useful&#8230; especially since we dont have four corner backgrounds..  one can wish..  <img src='http://foohack.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Isaac</title>
		<link>http://foohack.com/2007/10/top-5-css-mistakes/#comment-337</link>
		<dc:creator>Isaac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 09:43:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foohack.com/2007/10/top-5-css-mistakes/#comment-337</guid>
		<description>That nested braces thing would be amazing, purely for this kind of thing: 

&lt;code class="block css"&gt;.navigation, #ft, .sidebar, .entry-meta {
  p, div {
    a {
      color:#000;
    }
    a:hover, a:active, a:focus {
      color:#f00;
    }
  }
}&lt;/code&gt;

Compare with the existing style:

&lt;code class="block css"&gt;.navigation p a,
.navigation div a,
#ft p a,
#ft div a,
.sidebar p a,
.sidebar div a,
.entry-meta p a,
.entry-meta div a {
	color:#000;
}
.navigation p a:hover,
.navigation div a:hover,
#ft p a:hover,
#ft div a:hover,
.sidebar p a:hover,
.sidebar div a:hover,
.entry-meta p a:hover,
.entry-meta div a:hover,
.navigation p a:active,
.navigation div a:active,
#ft p a:active,
#ft div a:active,
.sidebar p a:active,
.sidebar div a:active,
.entry-meta p a:active,
.entry-meta div a:active,
.navigation p a:focus,
.navigation div a:focus,
#ft p a:focus,
#ft div a:focus,
.sidebar p a:focus,
.sidebar div a:focus,
.entry-meta p a:focus,
.entry-meta div a:focus {
	color:#f00;
}&lt;/code&gt;

Sure, maybe it just means that the page needs to be better organized markup-wise, but that's not always an option.  I seriously pine for this functionality on a nearly daily basis, so much so that I've often considered writing a compiler just to get it.

Combinatorix should be done by computers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That nested braces thing would be amazing, purely for this kind of thing: </p>
<p><code class="block css">.navigation, #ft, .sidebar, .entry-meta {<br />
  p, div {<br />
    a {<br />
      color:#000;<br />
    }<br />
    a:hover, a:active, a:focus {<br />
      color:#f00;<br />
    }<br />
  }<br />
}</code></p>
<p>Compare with the existing style:</p>
<p><code class="block css">.navigation p a,<br />
.navigation div a,<br />
#ft p a,<br />
#ft div a,<br />
.sidebar p a,<br />
.sidebar div a,<br />
.entry-meta p a,<br />
.entry-meta div a {<br />
	color:#000;<br />
}<br />
.navigation p a:hover,<br />
.navigation div a:hover,<br />
#ft p a:hover,<br />
#ft div a:hover,<br />
.sidebar p a:hover,<br />
.sidebar div a:hover,<br />
.entry-meta p a:hover,<br />
.entry-meta div a:hover,<br />
.navigation p a:active,<br />
.navigation div a:active,<br />
#ft p a:active,<br />
#ft div a:active,<br />
.sidebar p a:active,<br />
.sidebar div a:active,<br />
.entry-meta p a:active,<br />
.entry-meta div a:active,<br />
.navigation p a:focus,<br />
.navigation div a:focus,<br />
#ft p a:focus,<br />
#ft div a:focus,<br />
.sidebar p a:focus,<br />
.sidebar div a:focus,<br />
.entry-meta p a:focus,<br />
.entry-meta div a:focus {<br />
	color:#f00;<br />
}</code></p>
<p>Sure, maybe it just means that the page needs to be better organized markup-wise, but that&#8217;s not always an option.  I seriously pine for this functionality on a nearly daily basis, so much so that I&#8217;ve often considered writing a compiler just to get it.</p>
<p>Combinatorix should be done by computers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Isaac</title>
		<link>http://foohack.com/2007/10/top-5-css-mistakes/#comment-209</link>
		<dc:creator>Isaac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 22:03:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foohack.com/2007/10/top-5-css-mistakes/#comment-209</guid>
		<description>Apparently, &lt;a href="http://www.last.fm/music/CSS/_/CSS+Suxx" rel="nofollow"&gt;these guys agree&lt;/a&gt;! ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apparently, <a href="http://www.last.fm/music/CSS/_/CSS+Suxx" rel="nofollow" class="external">these guys agree</a>! <img src='http://foohack.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
