<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Foo Hack &#187; Broken</title>
	<atom:link href="http://foohack.com/category/broken/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://foohack.com</link>
	<description>Isaac Schlueter on Web Development</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 20:58:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Hacking the Google Favicon</title>
		<link>http://foohack.com/2008/06/hacking-the-google-favicon/</link>
		<comments>http://foohack.com/2008/06/hacking-the-google-favicon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 01:36:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Isaac</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Broken]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Freebie]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foohack.com/?p=68</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#8217;s been a lot of nerd rage about the new google favicon.  I joined in with a rationalization for my distaste for their new design.  After a few days of the lower-case &#8220;g&#8221; on a gray background, I decided today that I just couldn&#8217;t take it.  Here&#8217;s how I fixed it, so <small><a href="http://foohack.com/2008/06/hacking-the-google-favicon/" class="internal">...Read More</a></small>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://foohack.com/2008/06/hacking-the-google-favicon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Going Fast, Frankenstein, and Refactoring</title>
		<link>http://foohack.com/2008/01/going-fast-frankenstein-and-refactoring/</link>
		<comments>http://foohack.com/2008/01/going-fast-frankenstein-and-refactoring/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 17:00:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Isaac</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Broken]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Code Beauty]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Code Ecosystems]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foohack.com/2008/01/going-fast-frankenstein-and-refactoring/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Very soon now, the project that has consumed my days for the last 6 months will go into public beta.  It's too early to pop the champagne, and that's not what this post is about.  However, the newness of this project is worth pointing out for the following reason: We're <em>already</em> planning a fairly major refactoring effort to take care of a lot of code rot that has crept into the designs.



That's right.  We haven't released anything, and there's already enough bloat to justify spending at least 2 weeks cleaning it up. <small><a href="http://foohack.com/2008/01/going-fast-frankenstein-and-refactoring/" class="internal">...Read More</a></small>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://foohack.com/2008/01/going-fast-frankenstein-and-refactoring/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top 5 CSS Mistakes</title>
		<link>http://foohack.com/2007/10/top-5-css-mistakes/</link>
		<comments>http://foohack.com/2007/10/top-5-css-mistakes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 17:00:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Isaac</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[20/20 Hindsight]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Broken]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[CSS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foohack.com/2007/10/top-5-css-mistakes/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is not a post about the top 10 mistakes that developers make when they write CSS.  That&#8217;s boring.

The CSS spec itself is littered with mistakes.  Deep, fundamentally misguided errors.  Real head-slapping WTFs that make you wonder if the people writing the spec had ever created a website in their lives.  <small><a href="http://foohack.com/2007/10/top-5-css-mistakes/" class="internal">...Read More</a></small>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://foohack.com/2007/10/top-5-css-mistakes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fix for Vi&#8217;s broken arrow key support in iTerm</title>
		<link>http://foohack.com/2007/09/fix-for-vis-broken-arrow-key-support-in-iterm/</link>
		<comments>http://foohack.com/2007/09/fix-for-vis-broken-arrow-key-support-in-iterm/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 17:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Isaac</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Broken]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Tools of the Trade]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foohack.com/2007/09/fix-for-vis-broken-arrow-key-support-in-iterm/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fixing the broken arrow-key support in Vi when using iTerm.  Incorporating some help from comments I got when I first <a href="http://isaacschlueter.com/2007/04/fix-for-vis-broken-arrow-key-support-in-iterm/" class="external">wrote about this problem elsewhere</a>.  Short answer: Set the default terminal setting to <code>linux</code> and everything Just Works. <small><a href="http://foohack.com/2007/09/fix-for-vis-broken-arrow-key-support-in-iterm/" class="internal">...Read More</a></small>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://foohack.com/2007/09/fix-for-vis-broken-arrow-key-support-in-iterm/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Whiting out ads: Is AdBlock even Necessary?</title>
		<link>http://foohack.com/2007/09/whiting-out-ads-is-adblock-even-necessary-any-more/</link>
		<comments>http://foohack.com/2007/09/whiting-out-ads-is-adblock-even-necessary-any-more/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 17:01:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Isaac</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Broken]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[In the Minds of Users]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[The Business]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foohack.com/2007/09/whiting-out-ads-is-adblock-even-necessary-any-more/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some people are <a href="http://whyfirefoxisblocked.com/" class="external">blocking Firefox users</a> because they feel that the <a href="http://adblockplus.org/en/" class="external">AdBlock Plus</a> plugin is "tantamount to theft."  This attitude is woefully wrongheaded---even without the plugin, you can't stop Banner Blindness. <small><a href="http://foohack.com/2007/09/whiting-out-ads-is-adblock-even-necessary-any-more/" class="internal">...Read More</a></small>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://foohack.com/2007/09/whiting-out-ads-is-adblock-even-necessary-any-more/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
